Articles worth reading

WHO says it is too early to reinstate face shield policy 

account_balanceMetro Manila access_time5 days ago

Despite the threat posed by the Omicron Covid-19 variant, the World Health Organization (WHO) on Tuesday said "it is still premature to reintroduce the face shields" with the "significant public discontent" on its mandatory use, a...

Photo courtesy of: K R De Asis/MPIO

Manila recognizes medical workers on Bonifacio Day 

account_balanceManila access_time5 days ago

The city government of Manila paid tribute to medical workers during the celebration of Andres Bonifacio’s 158th birth anniversary at Liwasang Bonifacio on Tuesday, according to a report by Philippine News Agency. The city again called me...

Return of face shield policy opposed

account_balanceMetro Manila access_time5 days ago

A leader of the House of Representatives on Tuesday said the government should implement strict border control measures instead of re-imposing the mandatory wearing of face shields to directly address the spread of the new Omicron variant of Covid-19...

Pasay News

Manila Bay

Bill proposes ban on Manila Bay reclamation

account_balancePasay News account_circlePaulo Rodriguez chat_bubble_outline0 Comments

A leader of the House of Representatives filed a bill that proposes to prohibit the Manila Bay reclamation.

“Manila Bay belongs to the Filipino people and must remain in public hands.”

Deputy Speaker and Pangasinan Rep. Rose Marie “Baby” Arenas stressed this as she filed a bill seeking to prohibit any and all forms of further reclamation activities in the entire Manila Bay area and declaring it as a “heritage site.”

The House leader said it is about time for Congress to step in to protect Manila Bay by imposing “serious” penalties against the further reclamation in the bay.

“Given the recent actions of President Duterte, as Chief Executive, and of the Supreme Court, as the judiciary branch of government, to step up its drive to protect Manila Bay, it is imperative that the Congress, as the legislative branch of government does the same, and further empower these other branches to implement such mandate,” Arenas said.

“It is high time for Congress to pass a law that will specifically ban, in no uncertain terms, and make it a serious criminal violation to allow, further reclamation in Manila Bay,” she said.

Under Arenas’ House Bill 3169, the Pangasinan solon wants to declare the entire Manila Bay area, covering its waterfront and sea waters, as a heritage site and prohibits any and all forms of further reclamation activities that will affect a portion or the entire Manila Bay area.

“This bill seeks to recognize and declare Manila Bay, in its entirety, not only a national historical landmark, but a heritage site that is protected, fully owned by the government, with management policies based on the preservation of an ecosystem and rights-based, people-centered development framework,” Arenas said.

She noted that the Philippine Reclamation Authority (PRA) already entered into some formal understanding or agreement with the cities of Manila, Pasay, Parañaque, Las Piñas, and Bacoor to reclaim 1,440 hectares along Manila Bay covering the area between the Cultural Center Complex to Las Piñas-Parañaque coast.

“The alarming National Reclamation Plan of the PRA aims to reclaim about 38,000 hectares all over the country, involving 102 projects, 70 percent or about 26, 234 hectares of water, which is along the coast of Manila Bay, thereby expanding Metro Manila by more than a third size of about 63,843 hectares,” she said.

Under House Bill 3169, Arenas seeks to revoke all Environmental Clearance Certificates (ECCs) issued by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and all permits issued by any government agency or local government units (LGUs) for the purpose of reclaiming Manila Bay Area.

The measure also disapproves all applications for ECCs pending with the DENR and all other Manila Bay reclamation-related permits pending with any government agency or LGU.

Violators of the proposed Act shall suffer the penalty of imprisonment of six years to 12 years imprisonment and a fine ranging from P5 million to P15 million, it said.

Any public officer who violates the proposed Act shall also be dismissed from public service with accessory penalties.
House Bill 3169 provides that if the offender is a juridical entity, the highest ranking official and the members of its board of directors or trustees who authorized the violation shall suffer the penalty imposed under this Act.

“The operator or owner thereof shall not be allowed to operate similar establishment or enterprise in a different name or style or in a different location,” the bill added.

The measure tasks the DENR to promulgate the necessary rules and regulations for the effective implementation of the proposed Act.


date_rangeDate Published
2 years ago
shareShare article
folder_openArticle tags
content_copyCategorized under

Share your thoughts with us

Related Articles

No releated news for this article.
Let's Stay Connected Like us on our Facebook page.
×
Click on the article to continue reading
Quezon City adopts no contact apprehension system Red Cross pushes saliva test Vaccines from COVAX to arrive in Q1 Makati Shangri-La to close doors on Feb. 1 Cities in NCR to start vaccination simultaneously Mother, girlfriend of Filipino infected with UK variant also test positive Send Press Release MNC Facebook Page MNC Twitter Page MNC Instagram Page LGU Spotlight Barangay Front Business Sports Entertainment Metro Gen Metro Feature